Research
Academic papers, new techniques, benchmarks, and theoretical findings in AI/LLM security.
Academic papers, new techniques, benchmarks, and theoretical findings in AI/LLM security.
2,003 items
ATrust is a defense for LLM agents that expands the trust boundary during runtime, starting from the user query as the root trust anchor and admitting task-essential external observations as new anchors. Evaluated on AgentDojo and AgentDyn with GPT-4o as the engine model, it reduces the attack success rate on AgentDyn from 37.80% to 4.37% while improving utility by 10.00%, outperforming AuthGraph by 12.33%.
Researchers study operator-induced vulnerability-targeted manipulation (VTM), where a customer-facing LLM assistant pursues a hidden operator goal by exploiting a vulnerability the customer discloses. They introduce GAP (Goal-Anchored Probing) and apply it to 15 LLMs across 540 scenarios, collecting 619,600 labeled replies. Fourteen of 15 models push the operator goal, 12 of them using disclosed distress or financial strain, and fine-tuned detectors identify exploitative pushes with 79% accuracy from the reply alone, versus at most 62% for zero-shot LLM judges.
SearchInject scores retrieved pages on relevance, search-abuse cues, instruction likelihood and two relevance interactions, then quarantines candidates above a threshold before they reach model context. On 300 held-out SciFact queries, top-10 target exposure dropped by 83.2-83.7% across BM25, a normalized hybrid and latent semantic analysis, with clean nDCG@10 changing by at most 0.0018. The frozen threshold produced 0.59-0.65% clean false-quarantine rates, above the calibration constraint, and the generation follow-up cannot estimate a reduction in attack success.
This paper maps the OWASP MCP Top 10 to three architectural tiers (server-primary, gateway-primary, protocol-primary) using a cascading decision tree and Design Science Research. It was validated against an enterprise Managed File Transfer MCP server built in Go, where high-confidence server-tier controls worked as predicted but protocol-tier controls failed for architectural reasons beyond server implementation.
Researchers study indirect prompt injection against blue-team LLM agents in Security Operations Centers, where malicious text in telemetry, tickets, retrieval results or memory can corrupt intermediate outputs such as severity labels, incident narratives and IOC sets. They introduce StateFence, a task-aware evaluation and defense framework that maps attacks into explicit, stealth, multi-hop and persistent SOC evidence attacks and routes defenses by the attacked state. Across controlled and public-SOC validation cases, StateFence reduces attack success while preserving task utility and avoiding the indicator loss caused by task-mismatched filtering.
Researchers propose LoFIT (Local Conditional Fit), a membership inference method for text-to-image diffusion models that measures the initial response of the denoising loss along normalized conditional prediction shifts. The method needs only forward queries to the denoiser, no target-model gradients. Across four datasets it improves membership discrimination on fine-tuned and pretrained models, and it separates members early in fine-tuning where the naive denoising-loss baseline stays near chance.
Researchers measured how MCP servers and host applications handle human approval for destructive tool calls, using source code from a 1,000-repository sample of the official MCP registry and 41 open-source hosts and agent SDKs. They found an estimated 90% of destructive tools lack server-side confirmation, and 60.7% of sampled server-application pairs have no enforced human approval by default. In 479 of 960 runs, four of five low-cost models executed an injected deletion through four agent SDKs.
Fix: Applications should therefore configure approval. The source estimates that prompting for every tool not annotated read-only or non-destructive would cut the unapproved share of pairs to 5.4%, while universal elicitation support would leave 56.7%.
Arxiv (cs.CR + cs.CL + cs.LG)Researchers tested whether a language model's own top-label confidence can flag prompt-injection hijacks in classifiers, using AG News topic classification across five systems, three served through a provider's API. Low confidence ranked hijacked answers above clean ones with AUROC 0.86-0.90 on four systems, but a threshold allowing at most 5% clean alarms missed most hijacks. On the API systems, the monitor missed 51-70% of plain-note hijacks and 99-100% when the injection claimed certainty, though ranking still reached AUROC 0.70-0.79.
LeanGuard is a runtime that checks each tool call an LLM agent proposes against a policy written in Lean4 before the call executes, using fail-closed evaluation over state predicates and scoped past-time temporal operators. On Tau-Bench with five Qwen models (0.8B-27B), unguarded agents executed at least 33 forbidden calls while LeanGuard executed none, and on DTap it cut direct prompt-injection success from 57.9% to 5.9%.
Researchers embedded canary identifiers in synthetic patient records and tracked tool invocations across five language models, four boundary levels, and seven attack frames for identifier-free clinical tasks. Three models invoked PHI tools unnecessarily, while Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 did not. Stronger boundaries reduced this access, and a pre-execution gate given the task-necessity criterion nearly eliminated it.
Fix: A pre-execution gate given the task-necessity criterion, together with boundaries and access-log audits; the source states that output-only evaluation cannot verify minimum-necessary access and that these controls are required together.
Arxiv (cs.CR + cs.CL + cs.LG)This research paper proposes a three-layer security model for energy infrastructure and a hierarchical defense against adversarial attacks on Times-Series Large Language Models used for electricity-demand forecasting. The defense pairs a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning detector with signal repair at local control centers, plus an evidence-grounded LLM auditing agent with human-in-the-loop validation for Virtual Power Plants. The best MARL configuration reaches an F1 score above 0.91, signal repair cuts adversarial-to-clean Relative Squared Error by up to 83%, and detection and repair average 7.95 ms.
SANAI is a sensitivity-guided, bit-plane-selective scheme that protects quantized neural network weights against bit flips with zero additional parity-storage overhead. It hides parity inside the weights using keyed embedding, with spread-transform dither modulation binding parity to a secret key and keyed interleaving dispersing concentrated attacks across codewords. Across ten vision backbones and ten language models from 82M to 13B parameters, it stays within about one percentage point of clean accuracy at bit-error rates up to 12%, twice the maximum of prior embedded-ECC approaches.
Fix: SANAI is itself the proposed mitigation: it verifies weights on the load path with a streaming checker on an 8x8 systolic array, at 0.41% area overhead and no additional memory.
Arxiv (cs.CR + cs.CL + cs.LG)Researchers introduce ETUDE (Exploiting Tool Updates for Direct Execution), an attack that embeds malicious functionality into updates of initially benign tools while preserving their legitimate behavior. Because updated tool code runs outside the LLM's context window, the attack bypasses defenses limited to model-visible content. Across three attack workloads and seven agentic frameworks, including Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, and Claude Code, ETUDE reached a 97.6% ASR with a 95.9% legitimate task completion rate, and the authors found existing defenses insufficient.
The paper critiques AI surveys by using a case study on temporal features for trustworthy computer vision. It is published in ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 59, Issue 1, pages 1-35, January 2027. The source text provided contains only publication metadata, so the research question, method and findings cannot be stated from it.
The authors formulate a discrete-class text provenance framework that sorts human-AI co-authorship into distinct degrees of AI involvement, separating surface-level AI polishing from AI restructuring of discourse. They show that adversarial paraphrasing substantially degrades detectors trained only on benign data. Augmenting training data with adversarial paraphrases produces consistent robustness gains and good cross-generator transferability.
Fix: Augment detector training data with adversarial paraphrases generated by the state-of-the-art paraphrasing attack model.
Arxiv (cs.CR + cs.CL + cs.LG)This survey reviews threats to autonomous edge agents built on LLMs and SLMs in cyber-physical systems and IoT, organizing them across Perception, Cognition, Actuation and Collaboration layers. It finds that several attacks have been demonstrated on physical platforms, including jailbreaking a deployed commercial robot, while multi-agent attacks run only in simulation and software. It identifies three edge-induced threats that no surveyed edge-deployable runtime mechanism addresses: energy-targeted resource exhaustion, quantization-specific evasion, and model provenance against supply-chain weight poisoning.
The paper presents SEAL, a methodology for generating datasets to benchmark the security of tool-calling LLMs. It combines PyRIT for adversarial prompt generation and Promptfoo for structured evaluation under controlled inference-time settings, without training-time changes or external guardrails. Tested across three adversarial strategies, commercially aligned models and larger open-source architectures showed greater security stability, though a trade-off between robustness and operational availability emerged.
A paper in Applied Soft Computing (Elsevier BV), published 2026-11-01 under DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2026.116787, addresses prompt injection in LLM-driven hiring. The source text provided gives no further detail on the method or findings.
This research paper studies how prefill jailbreaks cause safety-aligned language models to continue an unsafe assistant prefix. Using the Jacobian lens, the authors track harmfulness and refusal signals through prefilling and generation, and identify refusal-state erosion, where the refusal signal declines to the benign baseline by the end of the prefill while the harmfulness signal stays above it. They introduce J-Anchor, a training-free inference-time defense that selectively restores weakened refusal in J-space, which substantially reduces attack success under fixed and deep prefill attacks across model families while largely preserving benign behavior.
Fix: J-Anchor: a training-free inference-time defense that uses the model's pre-attack harmfulness and refusal signals as a request-specific anchor and selectively restores weakened refusal in J-space during prefilling and decoding.
Arxiv (cs.CR + cs.CL + cs.LG)Researchers report that visual-token compression in large vision-language models can unmask a hidden backdoor. The authors identify context stripping, where pruning removes clean visual tokens that otherwise suppress an embedded trigger. They propose StripWake, a projector-only backdoor that stays at 0.4% attack success rate under full-token inference on LLaVA-1.5-7B, yet reaches 94.0%-99.7% across five primary compressors without CIDEr loss.