aisecwatch.com
DashboardVulnerabilitiesNewsResearchArchiveStatsDatasetFor devs
Subscribe
aisecwatch.com

Real-time AI security monitoring. Tracking AI-related vulnerabilities, safety and security incidents, privacy risks, research developments, and policy changes.

Navigation

VulnerabilitiesNewsResearchDigest ArchiveNewsletter ArchiveSubscribeData SourcesStatisticsDatasetAPIIntegrationsWidgetRSS Feed

Maintained by

Truong (Jack) Luu

Information Systems Researcher

AI Sec Watch

The security intelligence platform for AI teams

AI security threats move fast and get buried under hype and noise. Built by an Information Systems Security researcher to help security teams and developers stay ahead of vulnerabilities, privacy incidents, safety research, and policy developments.

Independent research. No sponsors, no paywalls, no conflicts of interest.

[TOTAL_TRACKED]
5,047
[LAST_24H]
5
[LAST_7D]
146
Daily BriefingSaturday, June 27, 2026
>

AI Coding Agents Vulnerable to DNS-Based Malware Injection: Researchers demonstrated that AI coding assistants can be manipulated through a social engineering chain where benign setup instructions trigger errors, prompting the AI to execute a suggested fix command that covertly retrieves and runs malicious code from attacker-controlled DNS records (the system that translates domain names to IP addresses). The attack is particularly insidious because the malicious payload never appears in the repository itself, evading traditional code review.

>

OpenAI Releases GPT-5.6 Sol With Enhanced Cybersecurity Controls: OpenAI launched a limited preview of GPT-5.6 Sol, its most capable model optimized for vulnerability research and patch development, featuring reinforced defenses against jailbreaks (techniques to circumvent safety restrictions) and guardrails to prevent offensive cyber operations. The company acknowledges the model may over-block legitimate security research requests during preview due to the dual-use nature of advanced cybersecurity capabilities.

Latest Intel

page 501/505
VIEW ALL
01

CVE-2020-15191: In Tensorflow before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a user passes an invalid argument to `dlpack.to_dlpack` the expected v

security
Sep 25, 2020

TensorFlow versions before 2.2.1 and 2.3.1 have a bug where invalid arguments to `dlpack.to_dlpack` (a function that converts data between formats) cause the code to create null pointers (memory references that point to nothing) without properly checking for errors. This can lead to the program crashing or behaving unpredictably when it tries to use these invalid pointers.

Critical This Week5 issues
critical

CVE-2026-50549: Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to 3.0, Cursor runs agent terminal commands in a sandbox by

CVE-2026-50549NVD/CVE DatabaseJun 25, 2026
Jun 25, 2026

Fix: Update TensorFlow to version 2.2.1 or 2.3.1, which contain the patch for this issue.

NVD/CVE Database
02

CVE-2020-15190: In Tensorflow before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, the `tf.raw_ops.Switch` operation takes as input a

security
Sep 25, 2020

TensorFlow versions before 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, and 2.3.1 have a bug in the `tf.raw_ops.Switch` operation where it tries to access a null pointer (a reference to nothing), causing the program to crash. The problem occurs because the operation outputs two tensors (data structures in machine learning frameworks) but only one is actually created, leaving the other as an undefined reference that shouldn't be accessed.

Fix: Update to TensorFlow version 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1 or later. The issue is patched in commit da8558533d925694483d2c136a9220d6d49d843c.

NVD/CVE Database
03

Participating in the Microsoft Machine Learning Security Evasion Competition - Bypassing malware models by signing binaries

securityresearch
Sep 22, 2020

This article describes a participant's experience in Microsoft and CUJO AI's Machine Learning Security Evasion Competition, where the goal was to modify malware samples to bypass machine learning models (AI systems trained to detect malicious files) while keeping them functional. The participant attempted two main evasion techniques: hiding data in binaries using steganography (concealing information within files), which had minimal impact, and signing binaries with fake Microsoft certificates using Authenticode (a digital signature system that verifies software authenticity), which showed more promise.

Embrace The Red
04

Machine Learning Attack Series: Backdooring models

securityresearch
Sep 18, 2020

This post discusses backdooring attacks on machine learning models, where an adversary gains access to a model file (the trained AI system used in production) and overwrites it with malicious code. The threat was identified during threat modeling, which is a security planning process where teams imagine potential attacks to prepare defenses. The post indicates it will cover attacks, mitigations, and how Husky AI was built to address this risk.

Embrace The Red
05

Machine Learning Attack Series: Perturbations to misclassify existing images

securityresearch
Sep 16, 2020

This post discusses a machine learning attack technique where researchers modify existing images through small changes (perturbations, or slight adjustments to pixels) to trick an AI model into misclassifying them. For example, they aim to alter a picture of a plush bunny so that an image recognition model incorrectly identifies it as a husky dog.

Embrace The Red
06

Machine Learning Attack Series: Smart brute forcing

securityresearch
Sep 13, 2020

This post is part of a series about machine learning security attacks, with sections covering how an AI system called Husky AI was built and threat-modeled, plus investigations into attacks against it. The previous post demonstrated basic techniques to fool an image recognition model (a type of AI trained to identify what's in pictures) by generating images with solid colors or random pixels.

Embrace The Red
07

Machine Learning Attack Series: Brute forcing images to find incorrect predictions

researchsecurity
Sep 9, 2020

A researcher tested a machine learning model called Husky AI by creating simple test images (all black, all white, and random pixels) and sending them through an HTTP API to see if the model would make incorrect predictions. The white canvas image successfully tricked the model into incorrectly classifying it as a husky, demonstrating a perturbation attack (where slightly modified or unusual inputs fool an AI into making wrong predictions).

Embrace The Red
08

Threat modeling a machine learning system

securityresearch
Sep 6, 2020

This post explains threat modeling for machine learning systems, which is a process to systematically identify potential security attacks. The author uses Microsoft's Threat Modeling tool and STRIDE (a framework categorizing threats into spoofing, tampering, repudiation, information disclosure, denial of service, and elevation of privilege) to identify vulnerabilities in a machine learning system called 'Husky AI', and notes that perturbation attacks (where attackers query the model to trick it into making wrong predictions) are a particular concern for ML systems.

Embrace The Red
09

MLOps - Operationalizing the machine learning model

research
Sep 5, 2020

Operationalizing an ML model (putting it into production so it can be used by real applications) involves deploying the trained model to a web server so it can make predictions. The author found that integrating TensorFlow (a popular ML framework) with Golang was unexpectedly complicated, so they chose Python instead for their web server.

Embrace The Red
10

Husky AI: Building a machine learning system

research
Sep 4, 2020

This post describes how the author built Husky AI, a machine learning system that classifies images as huskies or non-huskies, using a convolutional neural network (CNN, a type of AI model designed to process images). The author gathered about 1,300 husky images and 3,000 other images using Bing Image Search, then organized them into separate training and validation folders to build and test the model. The post notes a potential security risk: attackers could poison either the training or validation image sets to cause the model to perform poorly.

Embrace The Red
Prev1...499500501502503...505Next
critical

CVE-2026-50548: Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Prior to 3.0, Cursor runs agent terminal commands in a sandbox by

CVE-2026-50548NVD/CVE DatabaseJun 25, 2026
Jun 25, 2026
critical

CVE-2026-55413: ToolJet is the open-source foundation am AI-native platform for building and deploying internal tools, workflows and AI

CVE-2026-55413NVD/CVE DatabaseJun 25, 2026
Jun 25, 2026
critical

CVE-2026-12537: Improper Neutralization used in an OS Command in the container launcher in Google Gemini CLI (versions prior to 0.39.1)

CVE-2026-12537NVD/CVE DatabaseJun 24, 2026
Jun 24, 2026
high

Clean GitHub repo tricks AI coding agents into running malware

BleepingComputerJun 27, 2026
Jun 27, 2026