Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

Summary

Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang argue that asking whether a human read the code is an imprecise measure of review quality. They propose asking what could go wrong with a change and which check, automated or human, should catch it. Under this approach, review runs continuously while code is written, and Claude reviews most changes before a human looks at them.

Related items

• MediumFake Claude, ChatGPT Attacks Surge, Putting Developers at RiskSame vendor · Dark Reading
• InfoBank of America spent millions on anti-money-laundering tech, but not enough to avoid a $1.2B fineSame vendor · CSO Online
• LowMalware evasion made easier with AI — but behavior still gives it awaySame vendor · CSO Online
• InfoSpaceX policy manager set to testify as part of NYC Council AI safety investigationSame vendor · CNBC Technology
• InfoThe AI expectations gapSame vendor · Anthropic Research Blog