InfoResearchIndustry
A proposal for better informing the public about loss-of-control risks from frontier AI development
- Source
- METR(opens in a new tab)
- Published
- Record updated
Summary
METR proposes that independent assessors give the public evidence on whether frontier AI developers could lose control of their internal AI systems. The post argues that the public lacks visibility into internal development, and it describes three evidence gaps, covering alignment, control, and AI R&D acceleration. It proposes that developers work with METR on risk assessment exercises to share this evidence.
Related items
- InfoEight states accuse OpenAI of coaching children to harm themselves in lawsuitSame vendor · The Guardian Technology
- InfoEight states sue OpenAI, saying ChatGPT isn’t safe for kidsSame vendor · The Verge (AI)
- InfoOpenAI sued by 8 states over ChatGPT safety concerns Same vendor · CNBC Technology
- InfoOpenAI accuses employee who left for Apple of leaking plans for unreleased deviceSame vendor · The Guardian Technology
- MediumAnthropic 'SneakPeek' Flaw Is a Silent Zero-Click ThreatSame vendor · Dark Reading