Skip to content
InfoResearchIndustryLLM-specific

Beyond g-mean²: complementary metrics for monitorability

Published
Record updated
View JSON

Summary

The post introduces complementary metrics for evaluating monitorability beyond the dataset-level g-mean² measure, which scores how well a monitor discriminates target behavior across outcome, process and intervention evaluations. It argues that g-mean² alone leaves open whether model comparisons hold on shared task subsets and how a monitor performs when used as a deployment control that rejects outputs and allows retries. It uses post-control risk to address this, citing an example in which a model trained against a CoT monitor produced more accepted hacks under monitor-gated rejection sampling.