AI Sec Watch

The Kalrav AI Agent plugin for WordPress (versions up to 2.3.3) has a vulnerability in its file upload feature that fails to check what type of file is being uploaded. This allows attackers without user accounts to upload malicious files to the server, potentially leading to RCE (remote code execution, where an attacker can run commands on a system they don't own).

ChatterMate, a no-code AI chatbot framework (software that lets people build chatbots without writing code), has a security flaw in versions 1.0.8 and earlier where it accepts and runs malicious HTML/JavaScript code from user chat input. An attacker could send specially crafted code (like an iframe with a javascript: link) that executes in the user's browser and steals sensitive data such as localStorage tokens and cookies, which are used to keep users logged in.

This article argues that training AI models on copyrighted works should be protected as fair use (the legal right to use copyrighted material without permission for certain purposes like research or analysis), just as courts have previously allowed for search engines and other information technologies. The article contends that AI training is transformative because it extracts patterns from works rather than replacing them, and that expanding copyright restrictions on AI training could harm legitimate research practices in science and medicine.

Langflow contains a remote code execution (RCE, where an attacker can run commands on a system they don't own) vulnerability in its disk cache service that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending maliciously crafted data that the system deserializes (converts from stored format back into usable objects) without proper validation. The flaw exploits insufficient checking of user-supplied input, letting attackers run code with the permissions of the service account.

Langflow, a workflow automation tool, has a vulnerability where attackers can inject malicious Python code into Python function components and execute it on the server (RCE, or remote code execution). The severity and how it can be exploited depend on how Langflow is configured.

Langflow contains a remote code execution vulnerability (RCE, where an attacker can run commands on a system they don't own) in how it handles the exec_globals parameter at the validate endpoint, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code with root-level privileges. The flaw stems from including functionality from an untrusted source without proper validation.

Langflow contains a vulnerability in its eval_custom_component_code function that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code (RCE, or remote code execution) without needing to log in. The flaw occurs because the function doesn't properly validate user input before executing it as Python code, letting attackers run any commands they want on the affected system.

Langflow has a critical vulnerability where attackers can execute arbitrary code (commands) on the server without needing to log in, by sending malicious input to the validate endpoint. The flaw occurs because the code parameter is not properly checked before being run as Python code, allowing an attacker to run commands with root-level permissions (the highest system access level).

Ollama MCP Server contains a command injection vulnerability (a flaw where an attacker can insert malicious commands into user input that gets executed) in its execAsync method that allows unauthenticated attackers to run arbitrary code on the affected system. The vulnerability exists because the server doesn't properly validate user input before passing it to system commands, letting attackers execute code with the same privileges as the service running the server.