aisecwatch.com
DashboardVulnerabilitiesNewsResearchArchiveStatsDatasetFor devs
Subscribe
aisecwatch.com

Real-time AI security monitoring. Tracking AI-related vulnerabilities, safety and security incidents, privacy risks, research developments, and policy changes.

Navigation

VulnerabilitiesNewsResearchDigest ArchiveNewsletter ArchiveSubscribeData SourcesStatisticsDatasetAPIIntegrationsWidgetRSS Feed

Maintained by

Truong (Jack) Luu

Information Systems Researcher

AI Sec Watch

The security intelligence platform for AI teams

AI security threats move fast and get buried under hype and noise. Built by an Information Systems Security researcher to help security teams and developers stay ahead of vulnerabilities, privacy incidents, safety research, and policy developments.

Independent research. No sponsors, no paywalls, no conflicts of interest.

[TOTAL_TRACKED]
3,710
[LAST_24H]
1
[LAST_7D]
1
Daily BriefingSunday, May 17, 2026

No new AI/LLM security issues were identified today.

Latest Intel

page 212/371
VIEW ALL
01

CVE-2026-21518: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio

security
Feb 10, 2026

CVE-2026-21518 is a command injection vulnerability (a flaw where attackers can insert malicious commands into user input) in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code that allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass security features over a network. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of special characters in commands. No CVSS severity score (a 0-10 rating of how serious a vulnerability is) has been assigned yet by NIST.

NVD/CVE Database
02

CVE-2026-21516: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Github Copilot allows an unauthor

security
Feb 10, 2026

GitHub Copilot contains a command injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-21516), which is a flaw where special characters in user input are not properly filtered, allowing an attacker to execute code remotely on a system. The vulnerability was reported by Microsoft Corporation and has a CVSS score pending assessment.

NVD/CVE Database
03

CVE-2026-21257: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio

security
Feb 10, 2026

CVE-2026-21257 is a command injection vulnerability (a flaw where attackers can insert malicious commands into an application) found in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio that allows an authorized attacker to gain elevated privileges over a network. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of special characters in commands. As of the source date, a CVSS severity score (a 0-10 rating of how severe a vulnerability is) had not yet been assigned by NIST.

NVD/CVE Database
04

CVE-2026-21256: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio

security
Feb 10, 2026

CVE-2026-21256 is a command injection vulnerability (a flaw where attackers can sneak malicious commands into input that a program then executes) found in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio that allows unauthorized attackers to run code on a network. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of special characters in commands, which means the software doesn't properly filter or neutralize dangerous input before using it.

NVD/CVE Database
05

A “QuitGPT” campaign is urging people to cancel their ChatGPT subscriptions

industry
Feb 10, 2026

QuitGPT is a campaign urging people to cancel their ChatGPT Plus subscriptions, citing concerns about OpenAI president Greg Brockman's donation to a political super PAC and the use of ChatGPT-4 by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement for résumé screening. The campaign, which began in late January and has garnered over 36 million Instagram views, asks supporters to either cancel their subscriptions, commit to stop using ChatGPT, or share the campaign on social media, with organizers hoping that enough canceled subscriptions will pressure OpenAI to change its practices.

MIT Technology Review
06

80% of Fortune 500 use active AI Agents: Observability, governance, and security shape the new frontier

securitypolicy
Feb 10, 2026

Most Fortune 500 companies now use AI agents (software that can act and make decisions with minimal human input), but many lack visibility into how many agents are running and what data they access, creating security risks. The report recommends applying Zero Trust security principles (requiring strong identity verification and giving users/agents only the minimum access they need) to AI agents the same way organizations do for human employees.

Microsoft Security Blog
07

langchain==1.2.10

security
Feb 10, 2026

LangChain released version 1.2.10, which includes a bug fix for token counting on partial message sequences (a partial message sequence is a subset of messages in a conversation), dependency updates, and code refactoring to rename internal variables.

LangChain Security Releases
08

langchain-core==1.2.10

security
Feb 10, 2026

LangChain-core version 1.2.10 includes several updates: dependency bumps across multiple directories, a new ContextOverflowError (an exception raised when a prompt exceeds token limits) for Anthropic and OpenAI integrations, additions to model profiles for tracking text inputs and outputs, improved token counting for tool schemas (structured definitions of what functions an AI can call), and documentation fixes.

LangChain Security Releases
09

Is it possible to develop AI without the US?

industrypolicy
Feb 10, 2026

This article discusses major tech companies (Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta) planning to invest $600 billion in AI this year, while Persian Gulf countries are developing their own AI systems to reduce dependence on the United States. The piece raises questions about whether AI development can happen independently of US tech dominance.

The Guardian Technology
10

AI-Generated Text and the Detection Arms Race

safetyresearch
Feb 10, 2026

Generative AI has created a widespread problem where institutions like literary magazines, academic journals, and courts are overwhelmed by AI-generated submissions, forcing them to either shut down or deploy AI tools to defend against the influx. This has created an 'arms race' where both sides use AI for opposing purposes, with potential risks to institutions but also some unexpected benefits, such as AI helping non-English-speaking researchers access writing assistance that was previously expensive.

Schneier on Security
Prev1...210211212213214...371Next