{"data":{"id":"7ec00d75-d0b7-4252-b1a9-560cc426c8c3","title":"Llama 4 Series Vulnerability Assessment: Scout vs. Maverick","summary":"Meta's new Llama 4 models (Scout and Maverick) were tested for security vulnerabilities using Protect AI's Recon tool, which runs 450+ attack prompts across six categories including jailbreaks (attempts to make AI ignore safety rules), prompt injection (tricking an AI by hiding instructions in its input), and evasion (using obfuscation to hide malicious requests). Both models received medium-risk scores (Scout: 58/100, Maverick: 52/100), with Scout showing particular vulnerability to jailbreak attacks at 67.3% success rate, though Maverick demonstrated better overall resilience.","solution":"N/A -- no mitigation discussed in source.","labels":["security","research"],"sourceUrl":"https://protectai.com/blog/vulnerability-assessment-llama-4","publishedAt":"2025-07-16T16:54:17.000Z","cveId":null,"cweIds":null,"cvssScore":null,"cvssSeverity":null,"severity":"medium","attackType":["jailbreak","prompt_injection"],"issueType":"news","affectedPackages":null,"affectedVendors":["Meta"],"affectedVendorsRaw":["Meta","Llama 4","Llama 4 Scout","Llama 4 Maverick"],"classifierModel":"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001","classifierPromptVersion":"v3","cvssVector":null,"attackVector":null,"attackComplexity":null,"privilegesRequired":null,"userInteraction":null,"exploitMaturity":null,"epssScore":null,"patchAvailable":null,"disclosureDate":"2025-07-16T16:54:17.000Z","capecIds":null,"crossRefCount":0,"attackSophistication":"moderate","impactType":["safety","integrity"],"aiComponentTargeted":"model","llmSpecific":true,"classifierConfidence":0.85,"researchCategory":null,"atlasIds":null}}